Impact Factor: 1.2

Article

Images in cardiology

REC Interv Cardiol. 2019;2:138-139

Parallel stenting for the recanalization of an in-stent coronary occlusion

Stent paralelo en la recanalización de una obstrucción coronaria intra-stent

Soledad Ojeda,a,b, Simona Espejo,c and Manuel Pana,b

a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain

b Universidad de Córdoba, Instituto Maimónides para la Investigación en Biomedicina (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain

c Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain

A 48-year-old male was admitted to the hospital due to stable angina. The coronary angiography showed a very long in-stent coronary chronic total occlusion in his right coronary artery (RCA) (figure 1A). We attempted the retrograde access following failed antegrade access. At mid-RCA level, the guidewire was advanced outside the stent (arrows) (figure 1B). The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) conducted confirmed the correct position of the guidewire at the stent distal edge. However, in the gap between both stents, the guidewire was advanced to the subadventitial space and maintained this position along the full length of the proximal stent (arrows) (figure 1C). After predilation, 3 drug-eluting stents were successfully implanted (figure 2A). A double stent can be seen in the angiographic and IVUS images obtained (figure 2B and figure 2C): the previous (arrows) and the newly implanted stent. The computed tomography scan conducted 3 months later confirmed the exclusion of the old stent (arrows) from the coronary flow and the patency of the stents implanted in the subadventitial space (figure 2D). Six months after the index procedure, a new angiographic assessment confirmed the long-lasting good results (figure 3A). However, the optical coherence tomography showed significant late-acquired stent malapposition (figure 3B). The IVUS longitudinal views showed the old occluded stent (arrows) and, on the other plane, the stent malapposition (asterisks) (figure 3C), probably due to the hematoma reabsorption induced during the recanalization process. The patients remained asymptomatic. It was decided to maintain aspirin and ticagrelor until the next reassessment scheduled after an 18-month follow-up.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Corresponding author: Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Reina Sofía, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.
E-mail address: soledad.ojeda18@gmail.com (S. Ojeda).

Special articles

Recic Uk 23 075 F2

Original articles

Recic Uk 23 065 F3

Editorials


Original articles

Recic Uk 23 072 F3
Recic Uk 23 099 F3
Recic Uk 23 044 F1

Editorials

Recic 23 092 F2

Review Articles

Recic Uk 23 077 F1

Debate

Debate: Ablation vs lithotripsy in calcified coronary lesions

Recic 23 102 F1
Recic 23 100 F1

Review Articles

Recic Uk 23 128 F1

Scientific letters

Images in cardiology

Recic Uk 23 048 F1

Original articles