Access to side branches with a sharply angulated origin: usefulness of a specific wire for chronic occlusions

INTRODUCTION

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. In Europe, despite the decline in incidence and mortality between 1990 and 2009, these trends have slowed in recent years. Moreover, Mediterranean countries showed lower rate of decline during this period.1

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a particularly important presentation, associated with high mortality in young individuals.2,3 Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended as the first-line therapy to lower mortality and morbidity in STEMI patients.4-6 The timing of treatment is crucial for positive outcomes, and minimization of the time from symptom onset to revascularization is essencial.7,8 While several factors affect treatment timing, emergency system delays play a crucial role as they can be more easily altered by organizational measures and are often used as a quality measurement in STEMI networks.4,9-13

To ensure timely treatment, primary PCI centers included in STEMI networks are recommended to have a 24/7 service.4 However, the impact of admission time (on- vs off-hours) on treatment delay and patient outcomes remains a matter of debate. Some studies and a large meta-analysis have shown that off-hours admission is associated with worse outcomes, partially explained by longer system delays, less guideline-directed management, and less revascularization.14-16 Conversely, studies in high-volume PCI centers integrated in STEMI networks, demonstrated no differences in outcomes according to admission time.17-20 Overall, these results are heterogeneous and include populations from different health care systems.

In Europe, efforts have been made to improve STEMI care through public awareness, emergency medical system operations, and the implementation of a full national coverage 24/7 PCI network.21

The aim of this study was to determine the association between timing of admission in a PCI center and STEMI patients’ outcomes, within a STEMI network in south-western Europe.

METHODS

Study design and population

This retrospective observational cohort study identified 1369 consecutive patients treated with primary PCI at the catheterization laboratory of the Hospital de Braga (Portugal) between June 2011 and May 2016, through the local database that systematically includes all patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures. After an initial analysis, 115 patients were found to have evolved STEMI (> 12 hours since symptom onset) and were therefore excluded. To avoid duplication of results, we excluded 12 records of a repeat episode of STEMI in a patient previously identified in the selected time frame. Lastly, clinical follow-up data were not available for 20 patients, resulting in a final sample of 1222 patients (figure 1). These patients were divided into 2 groups according to admission time (on-hours and off-hours admission), and the main outcome measures evaluated were time delays, in-hospital mortality, and 1-year mortality.

Figure 1. Study flow-chart. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

 

Definitions

STEMI was defined as the presence of symptoms of myocardial ischemia, associated with electrocardiographic criteria for ST-segment elevation.4

Admission time was based on arrival at the catheterization laboratory. On-hours were defined as admission from Monday to Friday between 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM on non-national holidays.

The first medical contact was defined as the first contact with a health service (hospital or primary care clinic). In patients primarily attended by the emergency medical system, the moment when the emergency vehicle carrying a trained physician arrived at the location of the patient was recorded. The reperfusion time was considered as the moment when the angioplasty guidewire crossed the culprit lesion. Time delays from symptom onset to first medical contact (patient-dependent time), from first medical contact to reperfusion (system-dependent time) and from symptom onset to reperfusion (total ischemic time) were characterized.

Patient stratification according to the Killip classification was based on physical examination and the development of heart failure. A Killip class IV classification was assigned to patients in cardiogenic shock.22

STEMI network organization

Hospital de Braga has a 24/7 catheterization laboratory service for primary PCI, performed by senior interventional cardiologists (on-call during off-hours). The hospital is the only primary PCI-capable hospital in the Minho region in the north of Portugal and serves approximately 1.1 million people (figure 2). First medical contact can be made by the emergency medical system or in non-PCI-capable hospitals and clinics, which decide whether to transfer the patient to the PCI-center after consulting the on-call clinical cardiologist. First medical contact can also be made in Hospital de Braga, with rapid triage to primary PCI.

Figure 2. Referral network of the catheterization laboratory of Hospital de Braga.

 

Data collection and statistical analysis

The data for the present study were obtained from the local database of the patient undergoing PCI, the patient’s clinical record, and the electronic health registry of Portugal. Clinical and demographic variables were collected.

The IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) version 28.0 was used for data treatment. The variables studied to characterize the patients were divided into continuous variables and categorical variables. For the analysis of continuous variables, the distribution was first evaluated. If the variables showed symmetrical normal distribution, the results are presented as mean ± standard deviation, while for variables without normal distribution, the results are reported as median [interquartile range]. To compare continuous variables between the 2 groups of patients, parametric tests were applied for variables with normal distribution and nonparametric tests for the remainder. The Student t test for independent samples was used as the parametric test, after evaluation of the homogeneity of variances using the Levene test. The Mann-Whitney U test was the nonparametric test applied. For the description of categorical variables, absolute (No.) and relative (%) frequencies were calculated. The comparison of proportions between the study groups was made using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test when the percentage of cells in the table with an expected frequency less than 5 was greater than 20%. The 1-year survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, comparing the groups using the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis with Cox regression was performed, and was adjusted for confounding variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis (age, sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiogenic shock, and total ischemia time), to determine if the timing of patient admission was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were analyzed to determine the significance of the predictor. In all analyses, results with probability values of P < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Confidentiality and ethical considerations

Informed consent for the procedure was obtained in all patients. The confidentiality and anonymity of all collected data were ensured during all phases of the study. This study was approved by the local ethics committee and complies with the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent for the present analysis was waived by the ethics committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

Between June 2011 and May 2016, of 1222 consecutive patients with confirmed STEMI, a total of 439 (36%) were admitted on-hours and 783 (64%) were admitted off-hours. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups, including the percentage of patients admitted in cardiogenic shock (on-hours 5% vs off-hours 4%; P = .62) (table 1).

 

Table 1. Baseline characteristics

	Total (N = 1222)	On-hours (N = 439)	Off-hours (N = 783)	P
Clinical characteristics
Age, y	61 ± 13	62 ± 13	61 ± 14	.40
Female	269 (22)	102 (23)	167 (21)	.44
Smoking (active or previous)	625 (54)	218 (51)	407 (55)	.18
Dyslipidemia	553 (46)	201 (46)	352 (45)	.72
Diabetes	250 (22)	104 (25)	146 (20)	.04
Hypertension	622 (51)	224 (52)	398 (51)	.89
Previous history
ACS	84 (7)	28 (6)	56 (7)	.63
PCI	62 (5)	43 (4)	19 (6)	.38
CABG	11 (1)	5 (1)	6 (1)	.50
Presentation
Direct admission	452 (36)	159 (37)	293 (37)	.68
Anterior MI	642 (53)	229 (52)	413 (53)	.85
Cardiogenic shock	51 (4)	20 (5)	31 (4)	.62
Angiography
Multivessel disease	583 (48)	215 (49)	368 (47)	.51
Echocardiography
LVEF	44 ± 10	45 ± 10	44 ± 10	.41
ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Data are expressed as No. (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

 

Comparison of treatment delays

The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between groups for system-related, patient-related, and total ischemia time (table 2). Similarly, when examining patients directly admitted to the PCI-center, no significant differences were observed in terms of system-related, patient-related, and total ischemia time (table 2).

 

Table 2. Treatment delays

Irrespective of place of FMC	Total (N = 1222)	On-hours (N = 439)	Off-hours (N = 783)	P
Patient-related SO-FMC, min	87 [45-165]	82 [45-160]	89 [48-166]	.30
Emergency system-related FMC-reperfusion, min	123 [92-172]	120 [91-169]	123 [92-173]	.54
Total ischemic time SO-reperfusion	225 [164-354]	220 [159-343]	228 [165-360]	.39
Admitted directly to the PCI-center	Subtotal (N1 = 452)	On-hours (N1 = 159)	Off-hours (N1 = 293)	P
Patient-related SO-FMC, min	77 [40-150]	75 [45-155]	78 [40-150]	.96
Emergency system-related FMC-reperfusion, min	88 [68-115]	87 [68-115]	88 [70-115]	.54
Total ischemic time SO-revascularization, min	177 [125-265]	175 [127-254]	177 [124-267]	.92
FMC, first medical contact; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SO, symptom onset. Values are expressed as median [interquartile range].

 

Association between admission time and outcomes

A 1-year follow-up was completed for all patients included in the analysis. There was no association between on- and off-hours admission time and in-hospital (5% vs 5%; P = .90) or 1-year mortality (10% vs 10%; P = .97). Equally, in patients admitted on- and off-hours directly to the PCI center, in-hospital (4% vs 7%; P = .30) and 1-year mortality (9% vs 13%; P = .27) was similar.

Patients who experienced cardiogenic shock had significantly higher rates of both in-hospital (55% vs 3%; P < .01) and 1-year mortality (71% vs 7%; P < .01) compared with stable patients. However, the time of admission to the hospital did not show a significant impact on the in-hospital (on-hours 50% vs off-hours 58%; P = .57) or 1-year mortality (on-hours 65% vs off-hours 74%; P = .48) for those with cardiogenic shock.

Hospital admissions for heart failure did not differ in patients admitted on- and off-hours (3% vs 3%; P = .60).

Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences between timings in survival terms (log-rank P = .95) (figure 3). The timing of admission was not a predictor of 1-year mortality after adjustment (HR, 1.1; 95%CI, 0.74-1.64; P = .64). Independent predictors of mortality at 1-year are depicted in table 3, with cardiogenic shock emerging as the only strong predictor of 1-year mortality.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for 1-year survival. STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

 

Table 3. Predictive factors of 1-year mortality

	Adjusted HR*	95%CI	P
Age	1.08	1.06-1.10	< .01
Cardiogenic shock	12.64	7.60-19.47	< .01
Diabetes mellitus	1.49	0.98-2.26	.06
Hypertension	1.11	0.72-1.73	.63
Sex	1.29	0.78-1.88	.43
Smoking	1.06	0.65-1.74	.81
Total ischemic time	1.00	1.00-1.01	.06
95%CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. * Multivariate analysis with Cox regression adjusted for confounding variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis (age, cardiogenic shock, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, sex, smoking, and total ischemia time). Admission time was not associated with 1-year mortality in univariate analysis (P = .95).

 

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that there is no association between the timing of admission in the PCI center and adverse outcomes, in a structured STEMI network that offers PCI as the standard of care 24/7. Patients admitted off-hours had the same characteristics and were offered the same quality of care as those admitted on-hours, reflected by the similarity in treatment delays. Previous studies, in networks that provided the same quality of care whatever the admission time, reported no differences in outcomes.17-20

On the other hand, studies that report worst outcomes in patients admitted off-hours, mainly reflect differences in care during this period, with increased delay before revascularization, lower delivery of primary PCI, different procedural characteristics, and fewer available staff during off-hours.16,23-25 Additionally, several studies found that patients tended to have worse clinical status on admission during off-hours, which adversely impacted outcomes.16,26 A finding that supports the outmost importance of presentation status is the fact that cardiogenic shock at admission was found to be an independent predictor of 1-year mortality in this study. However, we did not find significant differences in presentation status according to admission time.

This analysis emphasizes that good organization of STEMI networks, with fast-track 24/7 primary PCI, is key to improve patient outcomes and to obviate the adverse impact of off-hours. However, time delays can still be optimized. Public awareness is key to reduce patient-dependent delays, and efforts should be made to improve recognition of symptoms and activation of emergency medical systems. System delays are quality of care indexes, and in this study, they are in the upper margin for benefit of PCI over fibrinolysis (120 minutes).4,27 This group previously analyzed the impact of interhospital transfer in time from first medical contact to reperfusion, and suggested improvements in chest pain work-up in emergency rooms and prompt transfer protocols after STEMI detection.28

Mortality rates in STEMI differ widely among analyses according to the geographical area, time frame analyzed, patient inclusion criteria, and patient management protocols.29,30 Nonetheless, in this analysis, mortality rates (5% in-hospital and 10% 1-year mortality) were in line with those reported in contemporary registries.2,31

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in a STEMI network in south-western Europe ensuring the feasibility and safety of on-call off-hours primary PCI in a contemporary STEMI network. This provides substantial reassurance to the usual organization of cath labs with on-call professionals, essential for workload management and organization of the laboratory workforce.

Study limitations

First, this is a single-center study and may not reflect regional differences in STEMI network organization. Moreover, the results of this study reflect those of a high-volume PC center with a long-standing 24/7 primary PCI program, which may differ from others due to diverse organizational features and available resources. This could be tackled by a future study analyzing national registry data.

Second, the retrospective nature of this study has the limitations inherent to this type of design.

Third, the definition of off-hours admission time is heterogeneous across the literature. In this study, it was defined according to the organizational features of the cath lab, which may not reflect off-hours in other centers/networks.

Additionally, overall mortality in this study may be underestimated, as the group of patients diagnosed in hospitals other than the PCI center and who died before or during transfer were not included in this analysis.

Another limitation of this study is the focus on the management of the patient exclusively until the performance of the primary PCI. Other factors that affect outcomes in these patients, most importantly the delivery of guideline directed medical therapies immediately after revascularization, were not analyzed.

Our findings, based on procedures conducted between 2011 and 2016, may not fully reflect the most current health care trends, given the continuous development of clinical guidelines and treatment approaches. For instance, the reduced use of thrombus aspiration, in line with updated guidelines, highlights the imperative for ongoing research to capture the latest developments in the field.

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary emergency network, STEMI patients’ admission time in the PCI-center was not associated with reperfusion delays or increased in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Mortality in efficient STEMI networks is primarily affected by the severity of clinical presentation.

FUNDING

None.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Informed consent for the procedure was obtained in all cases. The confidentiality and anonymity of all collected data were ensured during all phases of the study. This study was approved by the local ethics committee and complied with the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent for the present analysis was waived by the ethics committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Possible sex/gender biases were taken into account and avoided.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

The authors did not use artificial intelligence tools during the preparation of this study.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All the authors contributed to the study design, performed a critical review of the manuscript, gave their final approval, and are fully responsible for all aspects of the study guaranteeing both its integrity and accuracy.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide and is commonly characterized by the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (defined as any coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% in diameter).1 However, up to 60% to 70% of patients with angina and/or documented myocardial ischemia do not have angiographic evidence of CAD.2 This condition is defined as angina with no obstructed coronary arteries (ANOCA) or ischemia with no obstructed coronary arteries (INOCA) when associated with evidence of myocardial ischemia.3 Of note, despite the absence of CAD, these patients are at an increased risk of future cardiovascular events such as acute coronary syndrome, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and repeat cardiovascular procedures compared with healthy individuals.4,5 Therefore, appropriate management in terms of diagnosis and treatment is of the utmost importance to improve patients’ prognosis and outcomes.6 The Coronary Microvascular Angina (CorMicA) trial demonstrated that a strategy of adjunctive invasive testing for disorders of coronary function together with stratified medical therapy can improve outcomes (ie, reduction in angina severity and enhanced quality of life).7,8 However, there are still concerns about the implementation in real-world practice of a systematic diagnostic and therapeutic approach in INOCA and ANOCA patients, potentially impacting outcomes and quality of life.

We report our single-center experience of the implementation in clinical practice of a specific diagnostic and therapeutic protocol (no obstructed coronary arteries [NOCA] program) in INOCA and ANOCA patients.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria for the NOCA program

All consecutive patients diagnosed either at our hospital or at our referral centers with angina or ischemia with nonobstructive CAD on coronary angiography were referred to a specific outpatient clinic (the NOCA clinic at Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain) for a screening visit. Nonobstructive CAD was defined as angiographic evidence of normal coronary arteries or diffuse atherosclerosis with stenosis < 50% and/or fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80 if there was stenosis between 50% and 70%. During the screening visit, a team of expert cardiologists confirmed patients’ eligibility for the NOCA program based on the following criteria: a) diagnosis of ANOCA, defined as stable, chronic typical angina symptoms (eg, chest pain precipitated by physical exertion or emotional stress and relieved by rest or nitroglycerine); b) diagnosis of INOCA, defined as the demonstration of myocardial ischemia identified by a noninvasive test with pharmacologic or exercise stress tests such as cardiac single photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, stress electrocardiography, or echocardiography.3 The exclusion criteria were: a) atypical angina symptoms, and b) clearly identifiable noncoronary causes of chest pain (figure 1). The study protocol adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the study was approved by our institutional review committee. All patients provided written informed consent to be included in this program and study. The clinical ethics committee gave their approval for a retrospective analysis of the collected data.

Figure 1. Central illustration. Flowchart for the inclusion of patients in the NOCA program. Cath lab, catheterization laboratory; INOCA: ischemia with no obstructed coronary arteries; NOCA, no obstructed coronary arteries; NOCAD, nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

 

NOCA program: diagnostic approach

After patient inclusion in the NOCA program, specialized counseling was provided by expert cardiologists and nurses. All patients were thoroughly informed about their disease, the importance of reaching a specific diagnosis, and the importance implementing tailored therapy. During the counseling sessions, the predicted benefits and low associated risks of an invasive procedure to specifically study coronary microcirculation and vasospasm were explained in detail. All patients provided written informed consent to undergo coronary angiography and intracoronary provocation testing with acetylcholine (ACh).

Subsequently, all patients underwent a scheduled coronary angiogram with a comprehensive diagnostic work-up consisting of the following: a) coronary function testing to assess coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR); b) intracoronary ACh provocation testing to assess the presence of coronary vasomotion disorders (eg, epicardial or microvascular spasm).

Coronary function testing was performed using a pressure-temperature sensor guidewire (PressureWire X Guidewire and Coroventis CoroFlow Cardiovascular System, Abbott Vascular, United States) placed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) as the prespecified target vessel, reflecting its subtended myocardial mass and coronary dominance. Steady-state hyperemia was induced using intravenous adenosine (140 µg/kg/min). If there was severe tortuosity of the LAD or evidence of myocardial ischemia in a region other than the territory of the LAD, the wire was placed in the right coronary artery or the left circumflex, as per the operator’s decision. CFR was calculated using thermodilution, defined as resting mean transit time divided by hyperemic mean transit time (abnormal CFR was defined as ≤ 2.5). IMR was calculated as the product of distal coronary pressure at maximal hyperemia multiplied by the hyperemic mean transit time (normal value < 25).6,9

Intracoronary ACh provocation testing was performed with a standardized protocol involving serial ACh infusions for 20 seconds at increasing concentrations (2-20-100 µg in the left coronary artery with an interval of 2-3 minutes between each injection) with concomitant assessment of the patient’s symptoms, electrocardiogram documentation, and angiographic scans. Patients taking vasoactive drugs (eg, calcium channel blockers and nitrates) underwent a wash-out period of at least 48 hours before the provocative test.10,11,12 Epicardial coronary spasm was defined as the reproduction of chest pain and ischemic electrocardiogram changes in association with a reduction in coronary diameter ≥ 90% from baseline in any epicardial coronary artery segment.13 Microvascular spasm was diagnosed when typical ischemic ST-segment changes (deviation ≥ 1 mm) and angina developed in the absence of epicardial coronary constriction (< 90% diameter reduction).14

Subsequently, patients were stratified into 4 endotypes: a) microvascular angina (MVA) (evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction [CMD] defined as any abnormal CFR [< 2.5], IMR [≥ 25], or microvascular spasm); b) vasospastic angina (VSA) (CFR ≥ 2.5, IMR < 25 and epicardial spasm); c) both MVA and VSA (evidence of CMD and epicardial spasm); and d) noncoronary chest pain (CFR ≥ 2.5 and IMR < 25, with neither microvascular nor epicardial spasm).6

Any complications occurring during the invasive diagnostic work-up were documented, including bradyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, coronary perforations, death from any cause, and any other complications.

NOCA program: pharmacological and psychological therapeutic approach

Once the endotype was identified, medical treatment for each patient was optimized accordingly (table 1). In patients with MVA, treatment with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) was started or up-titrated. Ranolazine was added if angina symptoms were not fully controlled by beta-blockers and CCBs. In patients with VSA, treatment with nondihydropyridine CCBs and long-acting nitrates was started or up-titrated. In patients with both MVA and VSA, treatment with nondihydropyridine CCBs or beta-blockers was started or up-titrated. In patients with noncoronary chest pain, vasoactive drugs were discontinued unless clinically indicated for other reasons. Additionally, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statins was started or up-titrated in all patients. If a patient showed intolerance or had contraindications to a specific medication (eg, asthma for beta-blockers, perimalleolar edema for CCBs, severe bradycardia for both beta-blockers and CCBs), the treatment was tailored and modified accordingly.

Because stress is an important trigger factor for angina symptoms, all patients were also referred to a team of expert psychologists for psychological support.15

NOCA program: clinical outcome and quality of life evaluation

All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12-months for treatment titration and assessment of clinical outcomes. At the time of coronary angiography (ie, baseline) and at the 3-month follow-up, all patients were administered the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and quality of life questionnaire (EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D]). The SAQ is a validated 19-item self-administered questionnaire that measures 5 dimensions of CAD: physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception.16 The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific questionnaire used to describe and evaluate patients’ health status and was intended to complement other quality-of life measures.17 Figure 2 provides a visual representation of all the steps involved for patients included in the NOCA program.

Figure 2. Visual representation of the NOCA program. EQ-5D, EuroQol-5D; NOCA, no obstructed coronary arteries; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire. * See text for more details.

 

Statistical analysis

Data distribution was assessed according to the Kolgormonov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables were compared using the unpaired Student t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median and interquartile range [IQR]. Categorical data are expressed as numbers and percentages and were evaluated using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. A 2-sided P value < .05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 21 (SPSS, United States).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the study population

From January 2021 to December 2021, a total of 77 patients were screened at the NOCA clinic for inclusion in the NOCA program. Following the screening visit, 23 (29.9%) patients were excluded from the NOCA program: 12 due to atypical angina symptoms and 11 due to a clearly identifiable noncoronary cause. Consequently, 54 patients were included in the NOCA program (mean age 64.4 ± 9.4 years, 39 [63.9%] women). A total of 29 (53.7%) patients had INOCA and 25 (46.3%) had ANOCA. All clinical and angiographic characteristics of the study population are shown in table 1.

 

Table 1. Medical therapy according to the specific endotype of ANOCA/INOCA

Pathogenic mechanism of MINOCA	Therapeutic implications
MVA	Beta-blockers (Nebivolol 2.5–10 mg daily)
	CCBs (amlodipine 10 mg daily, or verapamil 240 mg daily, or diltiazem 90 mg twice daily)
	Ranolazine (375-750 mg twice daily)
VSA	Nondihydropyridine CCBs (verapamil 240 mg, or ciltiazem 90 mg twice daily)
	Long-acting nitrates (isosorbide mononitrate 30 mg)
MVA and VSA	CCBs (verapamil or diltiazem) or beta-blockers
Noncoronary chest pain	Beta-blockers or dihydropyridine CCBs if clinically indicated (eg, hypertension)
	ACEi or ARB if clinically indicated
	Statins if clinically indicated
ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ANOCA, angina with no obstructed coronary arteries; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; CCBs, calcium channel blockers; INOCA, ischemia with no obstructed coronary arteries; MINOCA, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease; MVA, microvascular angina; VSA, vasospastic angina.

 

NOCA program: diagnosis of the specific endotype and complications

The results of the invasive functional assessment are presented in table 2. The mean IMR and CFR values were 21.2 ± 10.6 and 2.3 ± 1.4, respectively. MVA was diagnosed in 19 (35.2%) patients, VSA in 12 (22.2%), and both MVA and VSA in 18 (33.3%). Finally, 5 (9.3%) patients were diagnosed with noncoronary chest pain.

 

Table 2. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients included in the NOCA program

Characteristics	Study population (n = 54)
Clinical characteristics
Age	64.4 ± 9.4
Female sex	39 (72.2)
Clinical presentation
ANOCA	25 (46.3)
INOCA	29 (53.7)
Diabetes mellitus	12 (22.2)
Hypertension	35 (64.8)
Dyslipidaemia	28 (51.9)
Former smokers	3 (5.7)
Current smoker	14 (25.9)
Familiar history of CV disease	5 (9.3)
Previous CV history
Prior MI	7 (13.0)
Prior PCI	8 (14.8)
Prior CABG	0 (0.0)
COPD	1 (1.9)
CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/m2)	4 (7.4)
Depression	15 (27.8)
Anxiety	19 (35.2)
Invasive functional evaluation
Vessel explored
LDA	48 (88.9)
LCx	3 (5.6)
RCA	3 (5.6)
IMR	21.2 ± 10.6
Increased IMR (≥ 25)	18 (33.3)
CFR	2.3 ± 1.4
Reduced CFR (< 2.5)	33 (61.1)
Increased IMR (≥ 25) and reduced CFR (< 2.5)	13 (24.1)
Diagnosis (endotype)
MVA	19 (35.2)
VSA	12 (22.2)
MVA and VSA	18 (33.3)
Noncoronary chest pain	5 (9.3)
ANOCA, angina with no obstructed coronary arteries; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CFR, coronary flow reserve; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CV, cardiovascular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IMR, index of microcirculatory resistance; INOCA, ischemia with no obstructed coronary arteries; MI, myocardial infarction; MVA, microvascular angina; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCA, right coronary artery; VSA, vasospastic angina. Values are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range].

 

Among INOCA patients, MVA was diagnosed in 11 (37.9%) patients, VSA in 7 (24.1%), both MVA and VSA in 8 (27.6%), and noncoronary chest pain in 3 (10.3%). Among ANOCA patients, MVA was diagnosed in 8 (32.0%) patients, VSA in 5 (20.0%), both MVA and VSA in 10 (40.0%), and noncoronary chest pain in 2 (8.0%). There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence of any endotype between INOCA and ANOCA patients (all P > .05, figure 3).

Figure 3. Prevalence of the different endotypes among INOCA and ANOCA patients. ANOCA, angina with no obstructed coronary arteries; INOCA, ischemia with no obstructed coronary arteries; MVA, microvascular angina; NCCP, noncoronary chest pain; VSA, vasospastic angina.

 

Complications occurred in 3 (5.5%) patients during intracoronary ACh provocation testing: 2 (3.7%) patients had transient bradyarrhythmias and 1 (1.8%) patient had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm.

NOCA program: treatment optimization according to the specific endotype

Inclusion in the NOCA program led to statistically significant changes in medications after diagnosis of the specific endotype. There was a significant increase in the use of beta-blockers (33.3% before vs 57.4% after, P = .008), nondihydropyridine CCBs (9.3% before vs 37.0% after, P < .001), and long-acting nitrates (46.3% before vs 63.0% after, P = .012). There were no statistically significant differences in any other medications before and after the invasive assessment (all P > .05, figure 4). All changes in medications according to the specific endotype of ANOCA/INOCA are shown in figure 5.

Figure 4. Differences in medical treatment before and after patient inclusion in the NOCA program. ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; DP-CCBs, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers; LA, long-acting; ND-CCBs, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

Figure 5. Changes in medications according to the specific endotype of ANOCA/INOCA. A: patients with MVA. B: patients with VSA. C: Patients with MVA and VSA. D: patients with noncoronary chest pain. DP-CCBs, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers; LA, long-acting; MVA, microvascular angina; ND-CCBs, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers; VSA, vasospastic angina.

 

NOCA program: clinical outcome evaluation

At 3 months of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean EQ-5D score compared with baseline (64.8 ± 18.1 at baseline vs 66.1 ± 17.1 at 3 months of follow-up, P = .302) (figure 6). However, there was a statistically significant improvement in the SAQ score in terms of physical limitations (59.7 ± 19.3 at baseline vs 66.2 ± 16.9 at 3 months of follow-up, P = .037), angina stability (57.1 ± 28.1 at baseline vs 75.8 ± 22.3 at 3 months of follow-up, P = .010), and disease perception (42.5 ± 13.9 at baseline vs 50.8 ± 16.3 at 3 months follow-up, P = .015). No statistically significant difference was found in angina frequency (74.3 ± 20.4 at baseline vs 80.7 ± 19.8 at 3 months of follow-up, P = .193) or treatment satisfaction (68.1 ± 12.6 at baseline vs 70.5 ± 12.5 at 3 months of follow-up, P = .950) (figure 7). No events were recorded at the 1-year follow-up.

Figure 6. Differences in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) score at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up.

Figure 7. Differences in SAQ score at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up. AF, angina frequency; AS, angina stability; DP, disease perception; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5D; PL, physical limitations; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire; TS, treatment satisfaction.

 

DISCUSSION

The main results of our experience can be summarized as follows: a) the implementation of a specific diagnostic and therapeutic protocol (NOCA program) in patients with diagnosed with nonobstructive CAD is feasible and allowed a parsimonious use of medical resources; b) a comprehensive diagnostic work-up in INOCA and ANOCA patients is safe, with a low rate of mild and transient complications (5.5%); c) the inclusion of patients in the NOCA program led to significant changes in medications and a significant improvement in their angina symptoms at the 3-month follow-up with no adverse events at 1 year.

Although accumulating evidence has demonstrated that an approach consisting of a comprehensive diagnostic assessment and stratified medical therapy in INOCA and ANOCA is crucial to improve patients’ prognosis, such an approach is far from routinely implemented in clinical practice.7,8 There are still concerns mainly related to the cost-benefit ratio, the associated prolonged procedural time, increased costs, and the risk of possible associated complications. Furthermore, in the most recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines, invasive coronary function testing is assigned a class IIa (“should be considered”) recommendation, while ACh provocation testing is supported by a class IIb recommendation (“may be considered”) to assess microvascular spasm and class IIa in patients under consideration for VSA.3 As a result, the management of these patients is commonly left to physicians’ discretion or relies on the experience of each center. Consequently, diagnosis of a specific NOCA endotype is frequently missed, and medical therapy is not optimized. This, in turn, has a significant negative impact on patients’ quality of life and clinical outcomes, as well as on health care costs, due to the need for repeat hospitalization or invasive procedures.18

In reporting our experience, we demonstrate that a specific diagnostic and therapeutic protocol (ie, the NOCA program) in patients with a previous diagnosis of nonobstructive CAD can be easily implemented in clinical practice. A key innovation of our study, compared with prior publications, is the creation and implementation of a specific protocol for the INOCA/ANOCA population. Additionally, our approach involves a screening visit with assessment by a team of expert cardiologists for patients with a suspected diagnosis of INOCA/ANOCA. This approach improves identification of such patients, and, in our experience, led to the exclusion of almost one third of patients (29.9%) due to atypical angina symptoms or no clearly identifiable coronary causes of chest pain. This is another novelty of our study that could be extremely relevant in the management of these patients. Indeed, the selection of patients to be included in the program may allow clinical resources to be directed to patients who are most likely to benefit, while avoiding repeat invasive procedures and related risks in patients with unclear indications. Additionally, the specialized counseling provided by cardiologists and nurses during the screening visit, together with psychological support, are likely to be vital components of the management of INOCA/ANOCA patients. Indeed, recent studies have demonstrated how psychological factors, such as chronic stress, anxiety, depression, and social stressors are involved in the pathogenesis of MVA and VSA.19-23 Mental stress has been demonstrated to determine CMD mainly through endothelium-dependent mechanisms and endothelial dysfunction.24 Similarly, by activating brain areas involved in regulation of neuroendocrine and autonomic nervous systems, mental stress can lead to hyperreactivity of vascular smooth muscle cells, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, oxidative stress, vascular inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, resulting in an increased propensity to coronary vasospasm.25-27

Furthermore, in line with previous studies,28-30 our experience demonstrates that performing a comprehensive invasive diagnostic assessment for the diagnosis of the specific endotype in INOCA and ANOCA patients is safe and is associated with a low rate of mild and transient complications. For all these reasons, patients and clinicians should be reassured about the lack of serious complications and cardiologists should be strongly encouraged to implement a specific diagnostic and therapeutic program in these patients. Indeed, the availability of such a program for INOCA and ANOCA patients may have significant clinical and therapeutic implications, as, in our experience, it resulted in substantial changes in medications and a marked improvement at the 3-month follow-up of the SAQ questionnaire regarding physical limitations, angina frequency, and disease perception. The lower and nonsignificant improvement in the other parameters (eg, angina frequency and treatment satisfaction) could be attributed to the already high baseline values (74.5 ± 19.9 and 69.6 ± 11.9, respectively). Similarly, the absence of a significant improvement in the EQ-5D questionnaire at 3 months might be due to the short follow-up period or the fact that it is a nondisease-specific questionnaire designed to describe and assess patients’ health status and is intended to complement other quality-of-life measures.31

Study limitations

Some limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, this is a single-center study with a relatively small sample size and short follow-up. Second, we did not perform a cost-analysis and therefore we cannot speculate on the impact of the NOCA program on health care-related costs. Further studies in larger ANOCA and INOCA populations are warranted. Finally, the absence of a control group precluded a thorough assessment of the improvement in the quality of life among these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates that a specific diagnostic and therapeutic protocol (NOCA program) can be easily and safely implemented in routine clinical practice. Such a protocol could ensure the best care for INOCA and ANOCA patients, as well as improve their quality of life and avoid inappropriate treatments and incomplete investigations. Future evidence from randomized clinical trials or recommendations from international clinical guidelines supporting the implementation of a specific protocol in these patients are strongly warranted.

FUNDING

This study received no funding.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and the study was approved by our Institutional Review Committee. All patients gave written informed consent to be included in this program and study. The clinical ethics committee gave their approval for a retrospective analysis of the data collected. In this work, the possible variables of sex and gender have been taken into account.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

No artificial intelligence tools were used during the preparation of this work.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

R. Rinaldi, F. Spione, F.M. Verardi: data extraction and analysis and manuscript drafting; R. Rinaldi, F. Spione, S. Brugaletta: design and manuscript revision; P. Vidal Calés, V. Arévalos, R. Gabani, D. Cánovas, M. Gutiérrez, M. Pardo, R. Domínguez, L. Pintor, X. Torres, X. Freixa, A. Regueiro, O. Abdul-Jawad Altisent, M. Sabaté: manuscript revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have nothing to disclose.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

F. Spione has been supported by a research grant provided by the Cardiopath PhD program.z

REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION

Moderate or severe coronary artery calcification is relatively common in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).1 This is closely related to advancing age and the high prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Coronary artery calcification is associated with a lower rate of successful PCI and complete revascularization, increased procedural-related complications, and a higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).2

Despite the availability of several plaque modification techniques, severely calcified lesions continue to pose a challenge to the successful performance of PCI.

Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is a plaque modification technique that has proved to be useful in various scenarios such as balloon failure (uncrossable or undilatable lesions), chronic total occlusions (CTO), stent underexpansion, in-stent restenosis (ISR), and thrombotic lesions. In recent years, incremental operator experience along with the standardization of the laser technique, has expanded its indications and decreased its complication rates.3,4

However, its effectiveness in calcified lesions is controversial. On one hand, some ELCA series have described a relationship between severe calcification and laser failure.5-8 On the other hand, moderate-to-severe calcification is found in more than 60% of cases in some ELCA series with a high success rate,9 suggesting that it could be useful in this setting.10

Due to the lack of evidence in this specific scenario, the aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ELCA in severely calcified coronary lesions, as well as the mid-term follow-up outcomes in a single center registry.

METHODS

Patient population

This single center retrospective observational study included all consecutive patients undergoing ELCA-assisted PCI for severely calcified lesions. From March 2016 to August 2022.

We excluded procedures using ELCA for any indication other than severe calcification. In all patients, PCI was indicated based on the presence of symptoms consistent with angina, demonstrated ischemia, or both. The study followed the international recommendations of clinical investigation (Declaration of Helsinki). All participants gave written informed consent and approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the center. The study took into consideration sex and gender variables according to SAGER guidelines. Patients were followed up in cardiology clinics at their referral center 3 to 6 months after the procedure, and thereafter at time intervals established at the discretion of their treating physician.

We analyzed data on clinical and angiographic characteristics, technical aspects of the procedure, and cardiovascular events during hospitalization and after discharge.

Procedure

All procedures were carried out by 5 different operators experienced in the use of ELCA. The decision to use ELCA was based on the presence of angiographically severe calcification.

Radial access was use by default. All cases were performed with the CVX-300 Excimer Laser System (Philips, Netherlands) using the 0.9 mm or 1.4 mm catheters. Saline infusion technique was used by default from the beginning, with fluence (mJ/mm²), frequency or repetition rate (Hertz), and the possibility to use ELCA without saline infusion or even with contrast left to the operator’s discretion. Additional dilatation with noncompliant balloons was performed in all procedures. Patients in which another plaque modification technique was used in combination with ELCA were included. All PCIs were performed following current recommendations.11

Definitions

Severely calcified lesions were angiographically defined as radiopacities observed on fluoroscopy without cardiac motion before contrast injection compromising 1 or both sides of the lumen.12 Balloon-uncrossable lesions were defined as lesions that could not be crossed with the lowest-profile balloon available or a microcatheter despite successful advancement of the guidewire distal to the lesion, having good guide catheter support with a guide extension catheter when required. Balloon-undilatable lesions were defined as those lesions in which a noncompliant balloon (diameter 1:1 according to the vessel diameter) failed to achieve adequate expansion. Anterograde flow was assessed by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scale.

ELCA success was defined as the ability to cross the lesion completely with the laser catheter or, if crossing was not feasible, to allow the subsequent passage and expansion of a balloon sized 1:1 with the vessel diameter, after laser application. Technical success was defined as residual stenosis < 30% and anterograde TIMI 3 flow in the target vessel. Clinical success was defined as technical success and the absence of MACE during the current hospitalization (target lesion revascularization, procedure-related myocardial infarction [MI], or cardiovascular death). Procedural-related complications included coronary artery perforation leading to cardiac tamponade and requiring pericardial drainage, flow-limi­ting dissection, no-reflow, hemodynamic instability, MI type 4a according to the fourth universal definition of MI,13 ventricular arrhythmias, and major bleeding (bleeding requiring transfusion and/or surgical or percutaneous intervention). MACE occurring during follow-up were defined as a composite of target lesion revascularization, MI, or cardiac death.

Statistical analysis and data collection

All data were collected through the patients’ electronic medical records and were introduced in a local database. Angiograms were evaluated using local quantitative coronary analysis software and visual operators’ assessment. Categorical variables are reported as absolute values and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range [IQR] 25-75), depending on their normal or nonnormal distribution. All analyses were performed with StatIC 16.1 statistical software package.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics

During the study period, a total of 78 patients with severely calcified coronary lesions underwent 80 ELCA-assisted PCIs and were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing ELCA for an indication other than severe calcification were excluded from the analysis. The distribution of the number of procedures per year, between March 2016 and May 2022, is shown in figure 1. A flowchart of patients in the present study is summarized in figure 2. Mean age was 71.2 ± 8.6 years, 62 (80.5%) were men, and there was a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Mean left ventricle ejection fraction was 52.9% ± 12.5%. Thirty-nine patients (50%) had a previous PCI. Clinical presentation was stable coronary artery disease in 45 procedures (56.2%), non–ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) in 28 (35%), and ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) in 7 (8.8%). Baseline clinical characteristics are summarized in table 1.

Figure 1. Distribution of the number of procedures per year (March 2016-May 2022).

Figure 2. Flowchart of patients in the present study. ELCA, excimer laser coronary atherectomy; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RA, rotational atherectomy.

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics

Age	71.2 ± 8.6
Male sex	62 (80.5%)
Body mass index (kg/m2)	28.7 ± 4.2
Hypertension	70 (89.7%)
Dyslipidemia	61 (78.2%)
Diabetes mellitus	46 (59.0%)
Current smoker	19 (24.4%)
Prior PCI	39 (50.0%)
Prior CABG	8 (10.3%)
Hb (g/dL)	13.5 ± 5.3
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)	1.42 ± 1.8
Ejection fraction (%)	52.9% ± 12.5
Clinical presentation (n = 98)
Stable coronary artery disease	45 (56.2%)
NSTEMI	28 (35.0%)
STEMI	7 (8.8%)
CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; NSTEMI, non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Data are expressed as no. (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

 

Angiographic characteristics

Severe multivessel disease was present in 56 patients (71.8%). The most common target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (38.75%). In 7 procedures (8.75%), more than 1 target vessel were identified. The anatomical settings in the target vessel included uncrossable lesions in 32 (40%), undilatable lesions in 23 (28.75%), ISR in 2 (2.5%), and stent underexpansion related to calcified plaque in 5 (6.25%). In 6 (7.5%) procedures, the main indication for ELCA was CTO combined with any of the previous settings. In 10 procedures (12.5%), the indication for ELCA resulted from the combination of 2 or more of the above. ELCA was used with the sole indication of severely calcified lesion, not included in any of the previous anatomical settings, in 2 procedures (2.5%).

Procedural characteristics

The radial approach was performed in 44 (55%) cases. There was no need for access conversion when the radial approach was attempted.

Dual antiplatelet treatment consisted of pretreatment with aspirin and oral P2Y₁₂ receptor blockers in 58 patients (72.5%). Selection of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor was left to the physician’s discretion. Cangrelor was used in the patients without prior dual antiplatelet treatment. After the procedure and during follow-up, dual antiplatelet treatment was prescribed as follows: in stable coronary artery disease (n = 45) clopidogrel was used in 21 patients, ticagrelor in 10 and prasugrel in 3 patients. In acute settings (n = 35), ticagrelor was administered in 16 patients, prasugrel in 10, and clopidogrel in 7. GPIIB/IIIA inhibitors were used in 6 procedures (7.5%) (tirofiban in all cases).

Intracoronary imaging was used in 58 procedures (72.5%). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used in 48 procedures (60%) and intravascular ultrasound in 10 (12.5%).

Circulatory support with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was required in only 1 patient in the context of left-main revascularization.

Regarding the ELCA technique, most lesions were treated with 0.9 mm laser catheters (97.5%). In 2 patients, larger catheters (1.4 mm) were used (1 case of ISR in the left anterior descending artery and 1 calcified lesion in a saphenous vein graft). Flushing saline was used in all the procedures, and contrast was required in 2 procedures (figure 3). Maximum fluence was 73 ± 9.6 mJ/mm² and the maximum frequency 72.7 ± 10.4 Hz. The highest fluence of 80 mJ/mm² was required in 48 (60%) procedures and the highest frequency of 80 Hz in 48 (60%). A mean of 5103 ± 3120 pulses was delivered, and the median lasing time was 62 seconds [IQR 40-91].

Figure 3. In-stent restenosis and stent underexpansion treated by excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA). Severe in-stent restenosis (ISR) (A1) (arrow) of drug-eluting stent previously implanted in the right coronary artery. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed calcified neoatherosclerosis with a minimum luminal area (MLA) of 1.25 mm² (A2). An everolimus-eluting stent (2.75 × 20 mm) was implanted, and despite postdilatation with a 3-mm noncompliant (NC) balloon (A3), subsequent OCT confirmed stent underexpansion (MLA: 2.1 mm²) (A4). Sixteen months later, critical ISR of the previous stent (B1) (arrow) was noted with heterogeneous neointimal proliferation (B2). Laser atherectomy was performed, followed by dilation with 3- and 3.5-mm NC balloons up to 24 atm, and a 3-mm sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted with acceptable angiographic expansion (B3) but underexpansion on OCT (MLA: 1.5 mm²) (B4) (arrow). Laser application with contrast injection was repeated and was dilated with a 4 mm NC balloon, achieving adequate stent expansion (MLA: 4.5 mm²) (B5, B6) (arrow).

 

At least 1 new-generation drug-eluting stent was implanted in 70 procedures (87.5%). In the remaining procedures, stents were not delivered because of the presence of previous stents (6 ISR and 2 cases of stent underexpansion), which were treated with noncompliant and/or drug-eluting balloons, or due to ELCA failure (2 cases).

Angiographic and procedural characteristics and procedural strategy data are summarized in table 2.

 

Table 2. Angiographic and procedural characteristics

Angiographic characteristics
Target vessel
Left anterior descending coronary artery	31 (38.75%)
Right coronary artery	28 (35.0%)
Circumflex artery	10 (12.5%)
Left main coronary artery	4 (5.0%)
Multivessel disease	56 (71.8%)
Indication for ELCA
Balloon-uncrossable lesion	32 (40%)
Balloon-undilatable lesion	23 (28.75%)
In-stent restenosis	2 (2.5%)
Stent Underexpansion	5 (6.25)
Chronic total occlusion	6 (7.75%)
Combination of > 2 of the above	10 (12.5%)
Severe calcification as sole indication	2 (2.5%)
Bifurcation	14 (17.7%)
Aorto-ostial	2 (2.5%)
Procedural characteristics
Access site
Radial	44 (55.0%)
Femoral	33 (41.2%)
Femoral-radial	3 (3.8%)
Guiding catheter French
6-Fr	40 (50.0%)
7-Fr	34 (42.5%)
Intracoronary imaging	58 (72.5%)
OCT	48 (60.0%)
IVUS	10 (12.5%)
Laser catheter
1.4 mm rapid-exchange catheter	2 (2.5%)
0.9 mm rapid-exchange catheter	78 (97.5%)
Maximum fluence (mJ/mm2)	72.97 ± 9.6
Maximum frequency (Hz)	72.7 ±10.4
Number of pulses	5 103 ± 3 120
Total lasing time (sec)	62 [40-91]
Contrast volume (mL)	211 ± 68.0
Fluoroscopy time (min)	30 [22-39]
Radiation dose (Gy/cm2)	103 [79-185]
Procedural time (min)	72 [55-100]
Stent implantation	70 [87.5%]
Stent diameter (mm	3.04 ± 0.50
Stents per procedure	1.8 ± 1.14
Total stent length (mm)	43.7 ± 25.7
Left ventricle assist device used	1 (1.25%)
Timing of PCI (n = 98)
Ad hoc	22 (27.5%)
Deferred	58 (72.5%)
ELCA, excimer laser coronary atherectomy; OCT, optical coherence tomography; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Data are expressed as no. (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range].

 

Procedural outcomes

The ELCA success rate was 91.25%. The success rate was 78.1% in uncrossable lesions and 100% in the other anatomical settings (P < .001). The ELCA success rate in the different anatomical settings is shown in figure 4.

Figure 4. ELCA success rate in the different anatomical settings. ISR, in-stent restenosis, CTO, chronic total occlusion.

 

Among intracoronary imaging-guided procedures, the ELCA success rate was 98.3%, and dropped to 72.7% in non-coronary imaging-guided PCI (P < .001). Final stent expansion was analyzed with intracoronary imaging in 32 procedures. The median stent expansion was 80.3% [IQR, 68.2%-95.2%].

Despite ELCA success, adjuvant plaque modification therapies (other than noncompliant [NC] balloon inflation after ELCA) were used in 4 procedures, including rotational atherectomy (RA) in 2 procedures, lithotripsy in 1 procedure and scoring balloon in 1 procedure. The procedures in which ELCA allowed subsequent successful RA (RASER technique14) or successful lithotripsy (ELCA-tripsy technique15) were considered ELCA success.

In 7 procedures (8.75%), ELCA failed. In 2 of them, RA was successfully performed. In 1 procedure, intravascular lithotripsy was attempted, but failed. In 1 case, the procedure was prematurely interrupted at the request of the patient. In the remaining 2 patients, no bailout therapy was attempted, and they were managed conservatively. Cases in which ELCA did not facilitate the passage of RA or intravascular lithotripsy were not classified as RASER or ELCA-tripsy techniques. The overall technical success rate was 91.25%.

In-hospital and follow-up outcomes

ELCA-related complications occurred in 2 procedures (2.5%) due to coronary artery perforation after ELCA application, with immediate sealing after stent implantation (although pericardiocentesis was necessary in 2 of them). A third perforation was observed, not immediately after ELCA application, but after dilatation with NC balloons. In 2 of the perforations, the target lesion was a severely calcified and undilatable lesion located in the left anterior descending artery. The third perforation was observed in an uncrossable lesion at the right coronary artery. In all of them, the 0.9 mm catheter was used, and ELCA was applied with maximum fluency and repetition rate during saline infusion. Intracoronary imaging prior to ELCA application was not performed in any of these patients: the OCT catheter could not cross the lesion in 2 of them and crossing was not attempted in the third. After the application of coronary laser and stent implantation, OCT was performed in 2 of the procedures, which confirmed the good final result.

Other procedural complications not related to ELCA occurred in 4 patients. One patient developed a vascular access complication with retroperitoneal hemorrhage and severe bleeding requiring transfusion and transarterial embolization of a deep femoral artery branch, although his clinical course was favorable. One patient with severe aortic stenosis and impaired left ventricular function showed hemodynamic instability requiring support with inotropes and orotracheal intubation. In 1 patient, no-reflow phenomenon occurred after stent implantation but resolved after intracoronary adenosine infusion.

In the remaining patient, coronary dissection occurred during the guidewire advancement before ELCA application and was complicated with occlusive intracoronary hematoma, which resolved after emergent PCI with successful revascularization. No patient died during the procedure. Three patients died during admission despite successful revascularization due to cardiac causes not related to the procedure (mostly advanced heart failure) and 1 patient died from respiratory sepsis. There were no other in-hospital complications. Overall, the clinical success rate was 87.5%.

After a median follow-up of 15.5 months [IQR, 5.02-29.3], MACE occurred in 9 patients (11.25%). Target lesion revascularization occurred in 7 patients (8.9%), in all patients due to ISR. The median time to target lesion revascularization among patients with successful revascularization was 11.4 [IQR, 8.1-22.6] months. Cardiorespiratory arrest secondary to acute stent thrombosis occurred in 1 patient with successful revascularization, whose family reported poor antiplatelet therapy adherence. One patient died from advanced heart failure after 3 years of follow-up, despite successful revascularization. Three patients died from noncardiac causes.

The procedural outcomes, clinical outcomes, and major complications are summarized in table 3. No significant differences were observed in the results between male and female patients.

 

Table 3. Procedural and clinical outcomes

Procedural and clinical success	n (%)
ELCA success	73 (91.25%)
Balloon-uncrossable lesion	25 (78.13%)
Balloon-undilatable lesion	23 (100%)
In-stent restenosis	2 (100%)
Stent underexpansion	5 (100%)
Chronic total occlusion	6 (100%)
Combination of > 2 of the above	10 (100%)
Severe calcification as sole indication	2 (100%)
Technical success	73 (91.25%)
Clinical success	70 (87.5%)
Procedural complications
ELCA-related complications
Coronary artery perforation	2 (2.5%)
Complications not related to ELCA
Vascular access complication with major bleeding	1 (1.25%)
Coronary perforation	1 (1.25%)
Flow-limiting dissection	1 (1.25%)
Hemodynamic instability	1 (1.25%)
No-reflow	1 (1.25%)
Ventricular arrhythmia	0 (0%)
In-hospital MACE
Recurrent angina requiring TLR	0 (0%)
Procedure-related myocardial infarction	1 (1.25%)
New-onset heart failure	0 (0%)
Stroke	0 (0%)
Cardiovascular death	3 (3.75%)
All-cause death	4 (5.0%)
MACE after discharge
TLR	7 (8.75%)
MI due to stent thrombosis	1 (1.25%)
Death from cardiovascular causes	2 (2.5%)
Non-cardiovascular related death	3 (3.75%)
ELCA, excimer laser coronary atherectomy; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; TLR, target lesion revascularization.

 

DISCUSSION

The main findings of our study are as follows: a) ELCA was associated with a high rate of technical success in severely calcified coronary lesions, whether isolated or combined with other plaque modification techniques, with an acceptable ELCA-related complications rate. b) The success rate was higher in undilatable than in uncrossable lesions and was 100% in peri-stent lesions (stent underexpansion or ISR).

As described in previous series, calcified lesions are associated with higher rates of PCI failure, complications, morbidity, and mortality.2,16 Although ELCA is known to have no direct effect on calcium, calcified atheromatous plaques have a mixed composition, including lipids, collagen, and other protein fibers.1,17 The interaction of ELCA with these components, due to its photochemical, photothermal and photokinetic properties, modifies the plaque structure, thus facilitating angioplasty in lesions with severe calcification.17 Moreover, in some cases, as occurs in our series, ELCA is complementary to other plaque modification techniques, allowing the passage of the microcatheter to introduce specific atherectomy guidewires, or even to allow the passage of the lithotripsy balloon.14,15 The RASER technique was used in 2 patients and the ELCA-tripsy technique in another patient with technical success in all 3 of them.

There is a lack of contemporary specific series on the use of ELCA in lesions with severe calcification, and data available in the medical literature are contradictory. Bilodeau et al.18 reported high procedural (93%) and clinical (86%) success in a series of 95 patients with complex coronary lesions, of which 57 had significant calcification. The Laser Veterans Affairs (LAVA) Multicenter Registry7 evaluated the use of ELCA in 131 target complex coronary lesions, of which 62% were moderately or severely calcified lesions, globally reporting 90% technical and 88.8% procedural success rate, which is consistent with our results. In the LEONARDO study,19 in which 75% of lesions were calcified, high laser energy levels were shown to be safe and effective (success rate 93.7%). In our series, the highest fluence and frequency were required in 60% of the procedures, with a similar success rate.

Nowadays, the main indication of ELCA is treatment of uncrossable and undilatable lesions. In uncrossable lesions, the laser catheter can be advanced over any 0.014¨angioplasty guidewire that crosses the lesion, unlike other plaque modification techniques. In a multicenter US registry, the success rate for laser-assisted PCI in uncrossable balloon CTO was 95%, which was higher than that for RA (89%) in this setting.20 In a retrospective study by Karacsonyi et al.,21 laser use in balloon-uncrossable and balloon-undilatable CTO was associated with higher technical (91.5% vs 83.1%) and procedural (88.9% vs 81.6%) success rates compared with cases without the use of laser. Ojeda et al.9 conducted a multicenter registry of 126 uncrossable lesions and reported ELCA success of 81.8%. In that registry, severe calcification was independently associated with ELCA failure, a finding already described in a previous study.22 In our series (with severe calcification in 100% of patients), the overall ELCA success rate was 91.25%, but the ELCA success in uncrossable lesions was lower than in undilatable lesions (78.1% vs 100%) and similar to that in the series by Ojeda et al.9 The lower success rate in uncrossable and severely calcified lesions can probably be explained by the different plaque composition and calcium distribution. Furthermore, the higher rate of use of intracoronary imaging could also be associated with better results (72.5% in our series compared with 22.5% reported by Ojeda et al.9). Of note, an ELCA success of 78.1% in uncrossable lesions with severe calcification could be a reasonable result, considering that, if even a microcatheter cannot cross the lesion, ELCA may be the only alternative for revascularization.

In other scenarios, the ELCA success rate of our series was high and similar to that of other series. An ELCA success rate of 86% to 93% has been reported in CTOs.8,23 RA in CTO has been associated with similar success rates (89%-95.6%)24,25 but with a high rate of slow/no flow phenomena.24 In patients with stent underexpansion and ISR, ELCA is feasible and effective,26,27 with 100% ELCA success in our series.

Intravascular imaging is useful to guide calcified coronary stenosis PCI.28,29 Contemporary rates of intravascular imaging for complex PCI remain low.30 In our study, intracoronary imaging was used in 72 procedures (73.4%), and intracoronary imaging-guided procedures resulted in a higher success rate. Its lower use in uncrossable lesions can probably be explained by the fact that the intravascular ultrasound/OCT catheter cannot cross the lesion, rather than necessarily being the reason for the lower success rate in this setting.

Limitations

Our study has some limitations. First, it is an observational study with a small sample size. However, to the best of our knowledge, our study represents the largest series of ELCA specifically performed in severely calcified lesions in contemporary PCI. Second, the severity of lesion calcification was initially assessed by conventional coronary angiography, which has only low to moderate sensitivity compared with intravascular ultrasound or OCT. In addition, sometimes the calcium observed by conventional angiogra­- phy is adventitious, thus not affecting balloon dilation or stent expansion with conventional techniques. However, the use of intracoronary imaging techniques was higher than in previous series and confirmed the severity of calcification in all patients. In addition, a significant number of cases consisted of uncrossable lesions, limiting the use of intracoronary imaging to define the calcification from the beginning of the procedure. Finally, the operators involved in this study were experienced ELCA operators. This may limit the generalizability of our results since ELCA is not available in most centers and requires a learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

ELCA is a useful tool in severe calcification lesions, with a high success rate, especially in the setting of undilatable or peri-stent lesions. The technique is also reasonably safe, given that it is used in highly complex procedures. Future randomized studies will shed light on its role in the management of severe calcified coronary lesions.

FUNDING

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

All patients signed an informed consent form and approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the center. The study has taken into consideration sex and gender variables according to SAGER guidelines.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

No artificial intelligence tool has been used during the preparation of this work.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

A. Jurado-Román conceived and designed the study. L. Cobarro and A. Jurado-Román performed the analysis and wrote the initial draft. L. Cobarro, A. Jurado-Román, D. Tébar-Márquez, S. Vera-Vera, A. García-Escobar, C. Ugueto, C. Contreras, B. Rivero, S. Jiménez-Valero, G. Galeote, and R. Moreno collected the data and reviewed the final version of the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

R. Moreno is associate editor of REC: Interventional Cardiology; the editorial procedure established in the journal has been followed to ensure impartial handling of the manuscript.

A. Jurado-Román is proctor of Philips-Biomenco, Boston Scientific, CSI-World Medica and Medtronic Inc and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, World Medica, Biotronik, Philips-Biomenco, and Inari. R. Moreno has received speaker fees from Medtronic Inc, Boston Scientific, Abbott vascular, Biosensors, Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, AMGEN, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo New Vascular Therapies and Biosensors.

REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION

Contrast induced-acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a dreaded complication after diagnostic and interventional angiographic procedures and is linked to increased morbidity and mortality. In a large recent meta-analysis, the pooled incidence of CI-AKI after coronary angio­graphy was 12.8%, with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 11.7%-13.9%, and the associated mortality was 20.2% (95%CI, 10.7%-29.7%).1 Multiple risk factors have been identified: contrast medium volume (CMV), advanced age (> 75 years), diabetes, anemia, conditions associated with hypotension, and ejection fraction (EF) < 40%.2,3 Many of these risk factors are included in the Mehran score,2 which identifies 4 risk classes of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after PCI: low (≤ 5 points), moderate (6-10 points), high (11-15 points), and very high (≥ 16 points). The Mehran score and the recent Mehran 2 score4 assign 1 point for each 100 mL of CMV up to a dose of 299 mL. Because volume depletion increases the CM concentration in renal tubules, the main preprocedural measure to reduce the occurrence of CI-AKI is intravenous administration of normal saline before and after the procedure, because other solutions provide no benefits5; hydration should be started 12 hours before and continued for 24 hours after the procedure at 1 mL/kg/h or 0.5 mL/kg/h if EF < 35% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class > 2.6 Another means of decreasing CM concentration in the kidneys is the DyeVert Contrast Reduction system (Osprey Medical Inc, United States), which reduces the amount of CMV delivered to patients during angiographic procedures, with noninferior image quality as attested by independent reviewers.7,8 The DyeVert, DyeVert Plus and DyeVert Plus EZ are used in conjunction with manual contrast injection, and the DyeVert Power XT is used with automated contrast injection; the latter system has been little studied. The main aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the DyeVert Power XT system in reducing CM delivery during PCI.

METHODS

Study population

This single center, observational study was performed in patients who underwent PCI between September 2020 and December 2022 with the DyeVert Power XT system (case group) and in patients who underwent PCI during a similar period without the use of the device (control group).

Inclusion criteria for both groups were as follows: chronic kidney disease (CKD) [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/m²] and/or need for a complex PCI with the likelihood of receiving a large amount of CM; previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); chronic total occlusion (CTO) (complete blockage of a coronary artery lasting at least 3 months); bifurcation; and left main and/or multivessel disease (at least 2 vessels involved).

The exclusion criterion for both groups was the presence of end-stage kidney failure on dialysis treatment. We collected laboratory, instrumental, clinical, and procedural variables in the case and control groups. Definitions of all these variables are reported in table 1, table 2, table 3, and table 4. For the variables included in the Mehran score, we used the same descriptions as those used in the score. eGFR was calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) 4-variable equation, left ventricular EF by 2-dimensional echocardiography during hospitalization and before arrival in the catheterization laboratory, and the risk of any post-PCI CIN by the Mehran score. Bifurcation/left main treatment (with single/double stent) consisted of the proximal optimization technique (POT) with kissing balloon inflation and eventually re-POT in all cases. Total CMV represents the volume that would have been delivered if DyeVert had not been used, ie, the sum of CMV delivered to patients and the CMV saved by DyeVert. CM injection flow was 4 and 3 mL/sec for the left and right coronary artery, respectively.

 

Table 1. Laboratory, instrumental, clinical characteristics, and Mehran score in the overall population and according to incidence of CI-AKI in the case group

Characteristics	Overall population (n = 101)	No CI-AKI (n = 87)	CI-AKI (n = 14)	P
Laboratory and istrumental characteristics
eGFR, mL/min	51 ± 18	52 ± 19	45 ± 16	.18
HCT	38.6 ± 4.9	39.1 ± 4.8	35.5 ± 4.8	.01*
EF	50 [35-55]	50 [40-55]	30 [28-36]	< .001*
CKD [eGFR < 60 mL/min/ 1.73 m2]	73 (72.3)	63 (72.4)	10 (71.4)	1
Anemia [male HCT < 39%, female HCT < 36%]	48 (47.5)	38 (43.7)	10 (71.4)	.10
Clinical characteristics
Age, years	74 (68-80)	73 (67-80)	75 (74-81)	.09
Age > 75 years	39 (38.6)	32 (36.8)	7 (50)	.52
Male sex	80 (79.2)	68 (78.2)	12 (85.7)	.73
Overweight [body mass index ≥ 25]	52 (51.5)	46 (52.9)	6 (42.9)	.68
Hypertension	78 (77.2)	70 (80.5)	8 (57.1)	.08
Diabetes	48 (47.5)	40 (46)	8 (57.1)	.62
Dyslipidemia	68 (67.3)	57 (66)	11 (79)	.51
Current smoker	24 (23.8)	20 (23)	4 (28.6)	.74
Former smoker	35 (34.7)	32 (36.8)	3 (21.4)	.37
CHF [NYHA class ≥ 3 and/or history of pulmonary edema]	37 (36.6)	25 (28.7)	12 (85.7)	< .001*
Acute coronary syndrome presentation	38 (37.6)	31 (35.6)	7 (50)	.46
Hypotension [Systolic arterial pressure < 80 mmHg for ≥ 1 h requiring inotrope]	4 (4)	2 (2.3)	2 (14.3)	.09
Mehran score
Mehran CI-AKI risk class:
Low	24 (23.8)	24 (27.6)	0 (0)	.04*
Moderate	26 (25.7)	24 (27.6)	2 (14.3)	.51
High	34 (33.7)	29 (33.3)	5 (35.7)	1
Very high	17 (16.8)	10 (11.5)	7 (50)	.002*
Mehran score, points	11 ± 5	10 ± 5	15 ± 4	< .001*
Values are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median [first quartile-third quartile]. *Statistically significant P-value (P < .05). CHF, congestive heart failure; CI-AKI, contrast induced-acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; EF, ejection fraction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCT, hematocrit; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

 

Table 2. Procedural characteristics in the overall population and according to incidence of CI-AKI in the case group

Characteristics	Overall population (n = 101)	No CI-AKI (n = 87)	CI-AKI (n = 14)	P
Procedural characteristics (angiography/PCI complexity/complications)
Previous CABG	20 (19.8)	18 (20.7)	2 (14.3)	.73
CTO [complete blockage of a coronary artery lasting at least 3 months]	12 (11.9)	11 (12.6)	1 (7.1)	1
No. vessels treated in the same procedure:
1	57 (56.4)	52 (59.8)	5 (35.7)	.09
2	40 (39.6)	32 (36.8)	8 (57.1)	.15
3	4 (4)	3 (3.4)	1 (7.1)	.45
No. bifurcations treated in the same procedure:
0	67 (66.3)	58 (66.7)	9 (64.3)	1
1	31 (30.7)	27 (31)	4 (28.6)	1
2	3 (3)	2 (2.3)	1 (7.1)	.36
Left main treatment	25 (24.8)	20 (23)	5 (35.7)	.33
Stent, number	2 [1-3]	2 [1-3]	2 [1-3]	.75
Stent lenght, mm	52 [31-88]	51 [30-91]	57 [36-73]	.95
Perforation	3 (3)	3 (3.4)	0 (0)	1
IABP use	1 (1)	0 (0)	1 (7.1)	.14
Rotablator use	3 (3)	1 (1.1)	2 (14.3)	.05
Procedural characteristics (others)
Radial access	88 (87.1)	75 (86.2)	13 (92.9)	.69
Femoral access	27 (26.7)	21 (24.1)	6 (42.9)	.19
Operator
L	52 (51.5)	47 (54)	5 (35.7)	.20
A	30 (29.7)	26 (29.9)	4 (28.6)	1
B	4 (4)	3 (3.4)	1 (7.1)	.46
V	13 (12.9)	10 (11.5)	3 (21.4)	.38
S	2 (1.9)	1 (1.1)	1 (7.1)	.26
Contrast medium type:
Iomeprol 350	9 (8.9)	7 (8)	2 (14.3)	.61
Iohexol 350	13 (12.9)	11 (12.6)	2 (14.3)	1
Iodixanol 320	79 (78.2)	69 (79.3)	10 (71.4)	.50
Contrast medium dose delivered, mL	242 [189-300]	240 [188-306]	258 [195-277]	.95
Total contrast medium dose [delivered plus saved], mL	355 ± 110	354 ± 79	356 ± 106	.95
IVUS use	24 (23.8)	23 (26.4)	1 (7.1)	.18
Data are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median [first quartile-third quartile]. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CI-AKI, contrast induced-acute kidney injury; CTO, chronic total occlusion; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound.

 

Table 3. Laboratory, instrumental, clinical characteristics, and Mehran score of cases and controls in the matched group

Characteristics	No DyeVert (n = 49)	DyeVert (n = 49)	P	Standardized mean difference
Laboratory and istrumental characteristics
eGFR, mL/min	53 ± 18	51 ± 18	.70	0.11
HCT	37.8 ± 4.1	38.2 ± 4.9	.68	0.08
EF	50 [40-55]	50 [35-55]	.68	0.13
CKD [eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2]	36 (73.5)	34 (69.4)	.82	0.09
Anemia [male HCT < 39, Female HCT < 36]	27 (55.1)	24 (49)	.69	0.12
Clinical characteristics
Age, years	75 ± 9	75 ± 9	.96	0.01
Age > 75 years	26 (53.1)	24 (49)	.84	0.08
Male sex	38 (77.6)	41 (83.7)	.61	0.15
Overweight [body mass index ≥ 25]	22 (44.9)	24 (49)	.84	0.08
Hypertension	33 (67.3)	37 (75.5)	.50	0.19
Diabetes	19 (38.8)	20 (40.8)	1	0.04
Dyslipidemia	28 (57.1)	32 (65.3)	.53	0.17
Current smoker	11 (22.4)	10 (20.4)	1	0.05
Former smoker	16 (32.7)	18 (36.7)	.83	0.09
CHF [NYHA class ≥ 3 and/or history of pulmonary edema]	15 (30.6)	15 (30.6)	1	< 0.01
Acute coronary syndrome presentation	27 (55.1)	25 (51)	.84	0.08
Hypotension [systolic pressure < 80 mmHg for ≥ 1 h requiring inotrope]	2 (4.1)	2 (4.1)	1	< 0.01
Mehran score
Mehran CI-AKI risk class:
Low	12 (24.5)	10 (20.4)	.63	0.09
Moderate	12 (24.5)	15 (30.6)	.50	0.14
High	13 (26.5)	15 (30.6)	.65	0.09
Very high	12 (24.5)	9 (18.4)	.46	0.16
Mehran score, points	11 ± 6	11 ± 6	.86	0.04
Data are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median [first quartile-third quartile]. CHF, congestive heart failure; CI-AKI, contrast induced-acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; EF, ejection fraction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCT, hematocrit; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

 

Table 4. Procedural characteristics of cases and controls in the matched group

Characteristics	No DyeVert (n = 49)	DyeVert (n = 49)	P	Standardized mean difference
Procedural characteristics (angiography/PCI complexity/complications)
Previous CABG	8 (16.3)	6 (12.2)	.56	0.10
CTO [complete blockage of a coronary artery lasting at least 3 months]	6 (12.2)	8 (16.3)	.77	0.13
No. vessels treated in the same procedure:
1	32 (65.3)	29 (59.2)	.53	0.12
2	15 (30.6)	17 (34.7)	.67	0.08
3	2 (4.1)	3 (6.1)	1	0.10
No. bifurcations treated in the same procedure:
0	33 (67.3)	31 (63.3)	.67	0.09
1	15 (30.6)	16 (32.7)	.83	0.04
2	1 (2.1)	2 (4)	1	0.12
Left main treatment	12 (24.5)	13 (26.5)	1	0.05
Stent, number	2 [1-3]	2 [1-3]	.30	0.15
Stent lenght, mm	46 [30-85]	52 [33-97]	.41	0.13
Perforation	2 (4.1)	1 (2)	1	0.12
IABP use	0 (0)	1 (2)	1	0.20
Rotablator use	0 (0)	2 (4.1)	.49	0.24
Procedural characteristics (others)
Radial access	41 (83.7)	45 (91.8)	.35	0.24
Femoral access	11 (22.4)	15 (30.6)	.49	0.18
Operator:
L	24 (49)	24 (49)	1	< 0.01
A	17 (34.7)	17 (34.7)	1	< 0.01
B	5 (10.2)	3 (6.1)	.71	0.20
V	3 (6.1)	5 (10.2)	.71	0.12
Contrast medium type:
Iomeprol 350	7 (14.3)	4 (8.2)	.34	0.21
Iohexol 350	9 (18.4)	10 (20.4)	.80	0.06
Iodixanol 320	33 (67.3)	35 (71.4)	.66	0.10
IVUS use	10 (20.4)	11 (22.4)	1	0.05
Data are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median [first quartile-third quartile]. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CI-AKI, contrast induced-acute kidney injury; CTO, chronic total occlusion; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound.

Image quality was evaluated by operators during the procedures. When quality was inadequate, exclusion of the device from the CM line was allowed for the shortest possible time.

AKI was defined as a rise in the concentration of serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours after CM administration from the baseline value obtained before CM injection; further measurements after 48 hours were collected in patients with worsening kidney function; for its prevention, all patients received hydration with sodium chloride 0.9% intravenous solution at a rate of 1 or 0.5 mL/kg/h, as appropriate. The severity of AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) stages.

The research reported was performed in accordance with recommendations for clinical investigation (Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association, October 2013) and was approved by an ethics committee. We declare that relevant informed consent was obtained from all participants and is available.

Objectives

In the case group, we evaluated the following: a) the amount of CMV saved using DyeVert and image quality; b) the rate and severity of CI-AKI and the rate of in-hospital all-cause death; c) laboratory, instrumental, clinical, and procedural differences in the 2 subgroups defined on the basis of the incidence of AKI; and d) independent predictors of CI-AKI.

In the overall population of the case and control groups, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) to obtain a group of patients with a sufficiently good balance (matched group), in which we evaluated the following: a) differences in CMV, and b) rate and severity of CI-AKI.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are expressed as the number and percentage of patients. Continuous parametric data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation and continuous nonparametric data as the median [lower and upper quartile]; for assessment of normality, the Kolmogorov test was used. Patients’ categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test (with Yates’ correction for continuity in the case of variables with only 2 categories) or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The unpaired t-test was used for continuous parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous nonparametric variables; the same tests were used in the matched group. On univariate analysis, significance was defined as P < .05. To establish the independent predictors of AKI, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis. Variables were selected according to significance in the univariate analysis. The chosen method was stepwise backward regression with a maximum of 20 iterations. Multicollinearity was assessed with tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF) values. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish the optimal cutoffs of independent predictors for the diagnosis of AKI. To perform PSM, the algorithm used was nearest neighbor matching 1:1 with a caliper size of ± 0.2. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, release 29, with R 4.2 implementation to perform PSM.

RESULTS

Analysis in the case group

A total of 101 patients (median age 74 [68-80] years, male sex 79.2%, CKD 72.3%) underwent PCI with the use of the DyeVert Power XT system.

In the overall population of the case group, mean hematocrit (HCT) was 38.6 ± 4.9 %, median EF was 50% [35%-55%], and mean Mehran score was 11 ± 5 points.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) was present in 37 patients (36.6%), Mehran CI-AKI very high-risk class was present in 17 patients (16.8%) and Mehran CI-AKI low-risk class was present in 24 patients (23.8%) (table 1).

We enrolled 20 patients (19.8%) with previous CABG, 12 (11.9%) with CTO, 34 (33.7%) with bifurcations, 25 (24.8%) with left main coronary artery disease, and 44 (43.6%) with multivessel disease. Delivered CM was 242 (189-300) mL, total CM was 355 ± 110 mL, and saved CM was 114 ± 42 mL, with an average of 32% of the total CMV (table 2). In almost all patients (n = 96, 95% of patients), image quality was adequate, while the device was excluded to make it adequate for the shortest possible time in 5 patients. Without these exclusions, saved CMV would have been slightly higher and with trivial changes with regard to the comparison with controls: 33% of the total, a value derived from patients without exclusions (n = 96).

A total of 14 (13.9%) patients developed CI-AKI (AKI-KDIGO 1, 2, 3: 6.9%, 3%, and 4%, respectively). The results of the univariate analysis for the overall population and according to the incidence of CI-AKI in the case group are reported in table 1, table 2, and figure 1.

Figure 1. In-hospital all-cause mortality rate according to onset of CI-AKI in the case group. CI-AKI, contrast induced-acute kidney injury.

 

Compared with patients not developing CI-AKI, those in the CI-AKI subgroup had lower HCT values (35.5 ± 4.8 vs 39.1 ± 4.8; P = .01), lower EF values (30 [28-36] vs 50 [40-55]; P < .001) and higher Mehran score values (15 ± 4 vs 10 ± 5; P < .001).

In addition, the first patients more frequently had CHF [12 (85.7%) vs 25 (28.7%); P <.001] and Mehran CI-AKI very high-risk class (7 [50%] vs 10 [11.5%]; P =.002) and less frequently had Mehran CI-AKI low-risk class (0 [0%] vs 24 [27.6%]; P = .04).

No significant differences were found in the remaining laboratory, instrumental, or clinical features or the procedural variables between the 2 subgroups; in particular, CM was slightly higher in CI-AKI patients: 258 [195-277] vs 240 [188-306] mL, total 356 ± 106 vs 354 ± 79 mL; P = .95 for both variables delivered. In the multivariate analyses, independent predictors of CI-AKI were HCT (OR, 0.86, 95%CI, 0.74-0.99; P = .04) and EF (OR, 0.88, 95%CI, 0.82-0.95; P = .001); the percentage accuracy in classification of the model was 88%, while tolerance and VIF values (0.99 and 1.01, respectively) showed no multicollinearity. The HCT ROC curve showed the following values: area under curve (AUC) 0.71 with 95%CI 0.56-0.87; P = .01; a cutoff of 36.3% had the best sensitivity (72%) and specificity (71%) for the outcome (figure 2). The EF ROC curve showed the following values: AUC 0.83 with 95%CI 0.72-0.94; P = .001; a cutoff of 37% had the best sensitivity (82%) and specificity (79%) (figure 2); therefore, our best predictor was EF < 40%.

Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic curves showing the diagnostic ability of HCT and EF for the diagnosis of CI-AKI in the case group. CI-AKI, contrast induced-acute kidney injury; EF, ejection fraction; HCT, hematocrit.

 

There were 4 in-hospital all-cause deaths overall, 2 deaths in each subgroup (CI-AKI and no–CI-AKI subgroups), as shown in figure 1.

Analysis in the matched group

After the matching process, 49 patients remained in the control (no DyeVert) and case (DyeVert) groups with no significant imbalance (ie, standardized mean differences < ± 0.25), as reported in table 3 and table 4. As shown in figure 3, delivered CM was slightly lower in the DyeVert group than in the no-DyeVert group, with no significant difference (252 ± 80 vs 267 ± 101 mL; P = .42), while total CM was significantly higher in the DyeVert group (354 ± 110 vs 267 ± 101 mL; P < .001). The CI-AKI rate was slightly lower in the case group than in the control group (14.3% vs 16.3%; P = .99) with slightly more advanced stages of AKI in controls (table 1 of the supplementary data), without significance.

Figure 3. Contrast medium in cases and controls in the matched group. CM, contrast medium; blue dots represent the median values; vertical black lines represent the standard deviations.

 

DISCUSSION

In the case group, the DyeVert Power XT system saved 32% of CM and image quality was adequate in almost all cases; the only independent predictors of CI-AKI were HCT and EF.

In the matched group, total CM was higher in cases than in controls. After diversion by the device, delivered CM was slightly lower in cases than in controls, but without significance. The reduction in CI-AKI was also nonsignificant.

The DyeVert system is a second-generation device to reduce the amount of CM delivered to patients during angiographic procedures. The first generation was the AVERT system (Osprey Medical Inc), which showed a relative reduction of approximately 23% in CMV among PCI patients compared with controls; the use of the device did not reduce the AKI rate.9 DyeVert Power XT is used in combination with automatic injection; few data are available in this context, being limited to 2 studies that investigated 2610 and 9 patients,11 without a control group. There are more data on manual injection (1696 patients, 15 studies); all these 17 studies were collectively analyzed in the meta-analysis by Tarantini et al.12

In that meta-analysis, the mean saved CMV in the DyeVert group was reported by 7 observational studies and ranged from 34% to 47% of total CMV; the pooled estimate value was approximately 39.5% using manual CM injection systems; of note, the lowest value (34%) was achieved using DyeVert Power XT. We found a similar value in the DyeVert (case) group. These reduced values compared with manual systems may be related to different pressures generated during automatic contrast injection.

In our case group analysis, CMV was not significantly correlated with the occurrence of CI-AKI, which instead was independently predicted by lower HCT and EF values, which are known risk factors, as shown by Mehran scores.2,4 EF was also an independent predictor in the study by Briguori et al.13 Our findings confirm the importance of first identifying the variables (eg, those in the Mehran or Mehran 2 scores)2,4 that classify patients at higher risk of CI-AKI to apply appropriate preventive strategies. In the present study, these patients were identified by HCT and EF and consequently the latter variables (especially EF) may be more important predictors than CMV, which is normally used during PCI in the general population. In the above-mentioned scores, CMV was also an independent predictor of CI-AKI and, consequently, using the smallest possible value of CMV is still important, especially in higher risk patients. DyeVert thus has the potential benefit of reducing CIN, depending on its efficacy compared with controls, which was evaluated in the above-mentioned meta-analysis and in the present study.

In the meta-analysis, approximately half of the studies included controls for comparison. Delivered CM was usually lower in DyeVert patients than in controls. In these cases, the difference ranged from 22 to 50 mL,12 with the highest differences being reported in the studies by Tajti et al. (200 [153-256] vs 250 [170-303] mL; P = .04) and Briguori et al. (99 ± 50 vs 130 ± 50 mL; P <.001).13,14 Delivered CMV was slightly higher (difference of 2 mL) in the DyeVert group only in the study by Bunney et al.15 The pooled analysis showed a significant decrease in delivered CMV with DyeVert use relative to the control group. Of note, details about prior CABG, CTO and left main treatment were reported only in 1 work14 and the number of vessels treated was reported only in another work.13 The treatment of bifurcations and differences in operators were not reported. All these procedural characteristics, which may influence the amount of CM delivered during PCI, were included in our study and we used a matched group with a sufficiently good balance in the studied characteristics.

In our matched group, delivered CM was lower in the case group than in the control group, but the difference was slight and nonsignificant, while total CM (also called attempted in the meta-analysis) was significantly higher in the case group than in the control group. Consequently, the net practical benefit of the device in terms of spared CM was low. In our work, procedural characteristics (eg, procedural complexity), which could cause discrepancies in CM injections, were balanced in the matched group. Based on these findings, we believe that the control group required more prolonged and/or a greater number of contrast injections (and consequently more total CM) to achieve adequate image quality. In previous studies, adequate image quality was achieved with DyeVert in 98% of cases,12 a value similar to ours, but those studies did not discuss the need for prolonged injections and more total CM compared with controls to maintain image quality when DyeVert is used. Few data are available on total CM, but previous studies reporting this information indicate that total CM was higher in DyeVert patients than in controls (Briguori et al., P-value almost significant; Kutschman et al., P-value not reported).12,13,16

The reduction in CI-AKI in the present study was not statistically significant. In the meta-analysis, the pooled relative risk for CI-AKI associated with DyeVert system use was 0.60 (95%CI, 0.40-0.90; P = .01), which was a result derived from 5 studies. Moreover, in a recent abstract not included in the meta-analysis, postprocedure eGFR values among patients undergoing coronary and/or peripheral angiography were significantly more stable in the DyeVert group than in controls.17

Analysis of the 5 above-mentioned studies separately revealed that our results are mainly in agreement; indeed, the relative risk was significantly lower in only 1 study in the nonpooled analysis.13

The type of CM was not associated with the occurrence of CI-AKI; as recommended,18 we used iso-osmolar (Iodixanol 320) or low-osmolar (Iomeprol 350 or Iohexol 350) contrast agents to prevent CIN. Given the presence of more favorable evidence,19 we preferred to use the iso-osmolar agent and reserved the other agents to low-risk patients.

Study limitations

Our study has some limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small. Second, the study design was single center, observational and retrospective, although we performed PSM to reduce potential confounding bias. Third, we excluded patients not meeting the inclusion criteria, as they were usually at low risk of CI-AKI. Therefore, our results should be generalized with caution, since the analyzed patients may be not representative of the general population. In this work the variable of sex has not been taken into account in accordance with the SAGER guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The DyeVert Power XT system saved 32% of CM, but only HCT and EF were independent predictors of CI-AKI and the main predictor was EF < 40%. Therefore, these variables (especially EF) may be more important than CMV, which is normally used during PCI in the general population.

PCI with this system required more total CM compared with that in controls to achieve adequate image quality. Consequently, after CM saving by the device, delivered CM was only slightly lower than CM in controls (mean difference of 15 mL) and this difference was nonsignificant. Therefore, the net practical benefit of the system was low. Equally, the reduction in CI-AKI (14.3% vs 16.3%) was not statistically significant.

Future studies are needed to confirm these results.

FUNDING

The authors did not receive any grants for this research.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The work has been approved by an Ethics Committee/institution. Informed consent of patients was obtained and archived for the publication of their cases. In this work the variable of sex has not been taken into account in accordance with the SAGER guidelines.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

We didn’t use artificial intelligence for the development of our work.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

F. Vergni, M.Arioti, and M.Leoncini contributed to the design of the work. F. Vergni, M. Arioti, V. Boasi, F.A. Sánchez, M.Leoncini, and F. Ferrari contributed to the acquisition of data. F. Vergni analyzed the data. F. Vergni, M.Arioti, V. Boasi, F.A. Sánchez, M. Leoncini, and F. Ferrari contributed to the interpretation of the data. F. Vergni and M.Arioti contributed to the drafting of the work. F. Vergni, M. Arioti, V. Boasi, F.A. Sánchez, M.Leoncini, and F. Ferrari revised the work and approved the final version to be published.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

 

REFERENCES