REC Interv Cardiol. 2022;4:87-88

Stent delivery during primary angioplasty: speed doesn’t matter

Despliegue del stent en la angioplastia primaria: no es cuestión de velocidad

Monica Verdoia,a,b and Giuseppe De Lucab,c,

aDivision of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy

bDepartment of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy

cDepartment of Cardiology, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy

See related content

Deflation speed of the stent delivery system and primary angioplasty results: a randomized study
Berta Vega, Armando Pérez de Prado, Juan Rondán, Carlos Cuellas-Ramón José Miguel Vegas, María López Benito, Tomás Benito, Eduardo Segovia, Felipe Fernández-Vázquez, and Íñigo Lozano

Although mechanical reperfusion has been shown to achieve epicardial recanalization in almost all acutely occluded arteries, the optimal myocardial reperfusion still remains a major issue, and it is only achieved in barely 50% to 70% of the patients with ST- segment elevation myocardial infraction (STEMI).1 Several factors have been demonstrated to have an impact on myocardial reperfusion including preoperative Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, ischemia time, ageing, diabetes, thrombus burden, and vessel size.1-3 Therefore, over the last few decades, several studies have been conducted on adjunctive therapies and devices to improve reperfusion such as antithrombotic therapies,4-5 and thrombectomy.6

The use of coronary stents, in particular drug-eluting stents, currently represents the standard of care,7 and considerable attention has been paid over the last decade on stenting techniques,8 and their impact on procedural results and outcomes.

In a paper recently published in REC: Interventional Cardiology, Vega et al.9 conducted a randomized trial to address the impact of the delivery system speed deflation on myocardial perfusion and the outcomes of patients with STEMI treated with direct stenting.

In fact, fast balloon deflation has been suggested to cause abrupt changes in coronary flow that may trigger the detachment of thrombotic material, and plaque fragments, disrupted by the stent strut coverage.10 Also, variations of intravascular pressure may increase the wall shear stress, which has been shown to promote plaque destabilization, endothelial dysfunction,11 and also the hydrostatic pressure inside the interstitial space favoring myocardial oedema, and cellular damage.12

Indeed, in post-conditioning strategies, balloon inflation has been proposed as a mechanism of protection against ischemic damage by inducing repeated sequences of ischemia-reperfusion that have been proven to reduce the infarct size.13

In a previous randomized study that recruited 211 patients, Gu et al.14 reported an improvement of coronary flow with the stent delivery system slow deflation strategy, yet with a not significant reduction of the no-reflow phenomenon, and null effects on the long-term outcomes.

However, this study primary endpoint was the corrected TIMI frame count, an index of coronary flow, whereas Vega et al.9 assessed the myocardial blush grade (MBG) and the ST-resolution, both parameters of myocardial perfusion that may be conditioned by several other factors.

In fact, the Spanish study9 was consistent with previous larger reports,8 and diabetes, hypertension, kidney disease, hemodynamic parameters, and lesion location emerged as independent predictors of MBG. Therefore, it may be argued that slow balloon deflation may have facilitated a successful epicardial reperfusion, although this did not translate into microcirculation differences or myocardial salvage.

Furthermore, although the extensive use of thrombectomy and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the overall cohort of patients, as the authors very well pointed out, is not representative of the current guidelines-indicated strategies regarding primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it may have prevented such complications and minimized any potential benefits with the delivery system slow deflation strategy. Indeed, former studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated that the administration of these potent antiplatelet agents during a primary PCI, mainly as a downstream strategy,15 could translate into better myocardial perfusion, and reduce mortality.

In addition, the recruitment restriction to those lesions eligible for direct stenting in the study conducted by Vega et al.9 may have led to the selection of a very low-risk population where the occurrence of an impaired MBG was extremely low (observed in about 25% of the study population).

Finally, since the study was stopped after the recruitment of 50% of the predefined sample size for futility, we cannot discard that, with a larger population and different endpoints, any differences would have emerged. Future larger studies with a more heterogeneous and higher-risk population of patients with STEMI, more complex lesions, a higher rate of comorbidities, less extensive use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are certainly justified to better define the potential role of slow balloon deflation during primary PCI in terms of periprocedural complications, myocardial reperfusion, short- and long-term outcomes.


None whatsoever.


None declared.


1. De Luca G, van 't Hof AW, Ottervanger JP, et al. Unsuccessful reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2005;150:557-562.

2. De Luca G, van 't Hof AW, Ottervanger JP, et al. Ageing, impaired myocardial perfusion, and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:662-666.

3. Timmer JR, van der Horst IC, de Luca G, et al.;Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Comparison of myocardial perfusion after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1375-1377.

4. De Luca G, Navarese EP, Cassetti E, Verdoia M, Suryapranata H. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in high-risk acute coronary syndromes patients undergoing invasive strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:198-203.

5. Verdoia M, Schaffer A, Barbieri L, et al. Benefits from new ADP antagonists as compared with clopidogrel in patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management:a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014;63:339-350.

6. De Luca G, Navarese EP, Suryapranata H. A meta-analytic overview of thrombectomy during primary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:606-612.

7. Di Lorenzo E, Sauro R, Varricchio A, et al. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction:RACES-MI trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:849-856.

8. Capozzolo C, Piscione F, De Luca G, et al. Direct coronary stenting:effect on coronary blood flow, immediate and late clinical results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;53:464-473.

9. Vega B, Pérez de Prado A, Rondán J, et al. Deflation speed of the stent delivery system and primary angioplasty results:a randomized study. REC Interv Cardiol. 2022;4(2):91-98.

10. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Choi YH, et al. Impact of plaque components on no-reflow phenomenon after stent deployment in patients with acute coronary syndrome:a virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2059-2066.

11. Han D, Starikov A, ÓHartaigh B, et al. Relationship Between Endothelial Wall Shear Stress and High-Risk Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics for Identification of Coronary Lesions That Cause Ischemia:A Direct Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e004186.

12. Garcia-Dorado D, Oliveras J. Myocardial oedema:a preventable cause of reperfusion injury?Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:1555-1563.

13. Xing Z, Tang L, Huang J, Peng X, Hu X. Effects of ischaemic postconditioning on outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention:a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e022509.

14. Gu J, Zhuo Y, Liu TJ, et al. Balloon Deflation Strategy during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction:A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Numerical Simulation-Based Analysis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:4826073.

15. De Luca G, Smit JJ, Ernst N, et al. Impact of adjunctive tirofiban administration on myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93:820-823.

* Corresponding author: Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria “Maggiore della Carità”, Eastern Piedmont University, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy.

E-mail address: (G. De Luca).

Congresses abstracts

Original articles

Recic Uk 21 040 F1

Recic Uk 21 039 F3


Original articles

Recic Uk 21 051 F2


Original articles

Recic Uk 21 088 F3

Review Articles

Recic Uk 21 081 F1


Debate: Severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis in non-high-risk surgical patients

Recic 21 089 F1
Recic 21 090 F1

Rotational angiography and the contribution of roadmapping to the occlusion of arteriovenous malformations

Domingo López Vázquez, Isaac Martínez Bendayan, et al.

How would I approach it?
Roberto Blanco Mata

Case resolution
Domingo López Vázquez, Isaac Martínez Bendayan, et al.

Cookies user prefences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics